Executive assessment

AI governance readiness assessment.

A browser-only diagnostic for leaders who need a structured view of AI governance maturity. Results are calculated locally in your browser and are not transmitted.

How to use

Score the current state honestly.

The purpose is not to look mature. It is to identify the first governance work that makes AI safer, faster to trust, and easier to explain.

Use “not established” when ownership is unclear.
Use “partially established” when practices exist but are inconsistent.
Use “formalized” when policy, owners, and evidence exist.
Use “operationalized” when practices are routine, measured, and continuously improved.

1. AI and agent inventory

2. Autonomy and consequence tiering

3. Decision rights and accountability

4. Evidence and traceability

5. Data provenance and sensitivity controls

6. Agent identity and permission boundaries

7. Human oversight and escalation criteria

8. Model / agent evaluation and monitoring

9. AI incident response

10. Policy, SOP, training, and adoption

11. Governance metrics and decision velocity

12. Vendor, procurement, and acquisition controls

Readiness score0 / 48

Tier 0 · Ungoverned or unknown

Complete the assessment to generate an executive brief.

Maturity tiers

How to interpret the score.

0–11

Tier 0 · Unknown

AI use is not governed with sufficient visibility, ownership, or evidence.

12–23

Tier 1 · Emerging

Governance exists in pockets but has not become a consistent operating model.

24–35

Tier 2 · Formalized

Key governance artifacts exist, but adoption, measurement, and control operation remain uneven.

36–48

Tier 3 · Operationalized

Governance is routine, measured, auditable, and able to support decision velocity.